Skip to main content

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments:



You can also read the NHS Guide to Care.Data, Information on Care.Data on NHS Choices, and an Unofficial Guide to Care.Data published by wired.co.uk.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Don't forget the constant failure of Government inspired databases
9:08 pm
cobweb said…
remember if you wish to agree to share there may be others in your life who may not wish to agree so you will be compromising their right to privacy
5:49 pm
Anonymous said…
"Don't forget the constant failure of Government inspired databases" <-- this database has been working fine for 25 years with secondary care data. All they're doing is expanding it to include primary care
2:03 am
boneman said…
I would say the 'Against' argument wins convincingly - on the basis of the two PowerPoint presentations...
1:48 pm
Anonymous said…
So sad to see so many against this excellent initiative. I would share my data willingly. Not just for my sake but for all mankind. Enormous benefits can come when all this data is "mined" by PhD students which can lead to better insights into some diseases and better treatments which benefit millions of people. Some comments elsewhere seem to be paranoid about private companies benefiting in some way. Every time you go to the chemist with a prescription it doesn't seem to bother you then. So the "Big Pharma" guys seem to be not so bad after all, when you need them.
8:32 am
Anonymous said…
There are a number of issues involved in care.data - including management of the linked datasets (which will be so rich that they ought to be considered re-identifiable): who has access and how that access is managed ( a 'data lab' environment such as the one operated by QResearch is inherently less risky than a release of the whole dataset): the quality of the data gathered, and whether the two (or more) datasets being linked contain comperable data.
see
http://phcsg.org/clicsig-5614-can-care-data-be-made-compatible-with-patient-confidentiality/
There has been support for the concept of using the incredibly rich data held in GP medical records for research purposes for a long time - hence the existence of research databases such as QResearch, the CPRD, ResearchOne, and THIN.
http://phcsg.org/publications/fair-shares-for-all-final/
2:28 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Example ADHD Referral Letter

Dear Dr, I am writing to refer a 28-year-old male patient of mine, Mr [Patient's Name], for assessment for the diagnosis and treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). After a thorough clinical assessment, I believe that Mr. [Patient's Name] meets the criteria for adult ADHD as outlined in NHS guidance for primary care teams in SE London. Mr [Patient's Name] has been under my care for XX years and, during this time, he reports several symptoms (greater than five symptoms in total) consistent with ADHD in adults that have been present for more than six months. These symptoms include difficulties in focusing, following through on tasks, hyperactivity, forgetfulness, impulsiveness, restlessness, and irritability. Mr [Patient's Name] also reports being easily distracted, struggling with time management, organisation, and completing tasks efficiently. Many of Mr [Patient's Name]'s symptoms have been present since he was under 12 years old; and have
Post a Comment
Read more

Dr Curran and Partners – Clinical Update 10 August 2023

1. Measles The UKHSA has warned that unless MMR vaccination rates improve, London could experience a large measles outbreak. Measles is potentially a very serious illness with important complications - but is preventable though vaccination.  Please ensure patients and their families are up to date with their vaccinations. Please also check the vaccine status of new patients - particular migrants - and enter details onto the medical record of any vaccines given elsewhere. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/london-at-risk-of-measles-outbreaks-with-modelling-estimating-tens-of-thousands-of-cases 2. Shingles vaccination The shingles vaccine programme is being expanded. From September, GP practices will offer: - Those aged 70-79, 1 dose of Zostavax or 2 doses of Shingrix - People aged 50+ with a weak immune system, 2 doses of Shingrix - Those turning 65 & 70, two doses of Shingrix vaccine. For further details, see https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/shingles-vacc
Post a Comment
Read more

Why we need to put an end to the GANFYD culture in the UK

One of the causes of increased workload in general practice are the many requests that doctors get for letters, reports and forms from patients or from external organisations. It’s now so common that doctors have coined a term for it: GANFYD – Get A Note From Your Doctor.  It’s seems that large sections of society can’t function without these “letters from doctors”. Instead of using common sense or employing their own clinical advisers, external organisations make repeated requests to NHS doctors for letters which are often not at all needed. Often the worst offenders come from the public sector – e.g. universities who seem to look upon NHS general practice as a source of free occupational health advice for their students. Universities never – of course - offer to pay for this advice they get from NHS GPs. Instead, university requests will come with a mealy-mouthed statement that any fee is the responsibility of the student. Like doctors are going to impose heavy fees on impoverished s
Post a Comment
Read more